On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 03:17:02PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 07/08/2019 14:42, Thomas Munro wrote: >> I think I'd put nowait and skip locked under a separate category "FOR >> UPDATE" or "row locking" or something, but maybe that's just me... can >> you call that stuff DML? > > Yeah, I guess SELECT FOR UPDATE isn't really DML. Separate "Row locking" > category works for me. Or maybe "Concurrent DML and row locking". There is > also DML in some of those tests.
Or would it make sense to group the nowait and skip-locked portion with the multixact group, then keep the DML-specific stuff together? There is a test called update-locked-tuple which could enter into the "row locking" group, and the skip-locked tests have references to multixact locks. So I think that I would group all that into a single group: "multixact and row locking". -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
