On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:48:29PM +0300, Liudmila Mantrova wrote: > If we decide to fix this, we should probably revise and back-patch the whole > paragraph where it appears as it seems to mix up scanning target cluster > WALs and applying source cluster WALs. A small patch is attached for your > consideration (originally proposed on pgsql-docs [1]).
Okay, I can see the confusion, and your proposed rewording looks fine to me. Any objections? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
