> On 31 Jul 2019, at 19:20, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:
> This patch makes the assertion more strict than it was before. I don't see > how it could possibly make a regression failure go away. On the contrary. So, > huh? Yeah, this is clearly fat-fingered, the intent is to only run the Assert in case XLH_INSERT_CONTAINS_NEW_TUPLE is set in xlrec->flags, as it only applies under that condition. The attached is tested in both in the multi-insert patch and on HEAD, but I wish I could figure out a better way to express this Assert. cheers ./daniel
logdec_assert-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
