Hi, On 2019-07-16 19:26:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > They don't preclude each other though. E.g. it'd be sensible to have both > > >> Per gripe from Ken Tanzer. Back-patch to 9.6. The issue exists > >> further back, but before 9.6 the code looks very different and it > >> doesn't actually know whether the "var" name matches anything, > >> so I desisted from trying to fix it. > > > and "Backpatch: 9.6-" or such. > > I've wondered for some time what you think the "-" means in this.
Up to master. Occasionally there's bugs that only need to be fixed in some back branches etc. Greetings, Andres Freund
