Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > They don't preclude each other though. E.g. it'd be sensible to have both
>> Per gripe from Ken Tanzer. Back-patch to 9.6. The issue exists
>> further back, but before 9.6 the code looks very different and it
>> doesn't actually know whether the "var" name matches anything,
>> so I desisted from trying to fix it.
> and "Backpatch: 9.6-" or such.
I've wondered for some time what you think the "-" means in this.
regards, tom lane
