On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 17:54, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Any further thoughts on this Michael? > > Or Andres? Do you have a preference to which of the approaches > (mentioned upthread) I use for the fix? > > If I don't hear anything I'll probably just push the first fix. The > inefficiency does not affect heap, so likely the people with the most > interest in improving that will be authors of other table AMs that > actually do something during table_finish_bulk_insert() for > partitions. We could revisit this in PG13 if someone comes up with a > need to improve things here. I've pushed the original patch plus a small change to only call table_finish_bulk_insert() for the target of the copy when we're using bulk inserts. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
