On 2019-05-15 19:58, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-05-15 13:53:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FWIW, given the conflict against "EXPLAIN EXECUTE prepared_stmt_name",
>> we should probably just drop the whole idea. It seemed like a great
>> idea at the time, but it's going to confuse people not just Bison.
> I'm not particularly invested in the idea of renaming ANALYZE - but I
> think we might be able to come up with something less ambiguous than
> EXECUTE. Even EXECUTION might be better.
The GQL draft uses PROFILE as a separate top-level command, so it would be
PROFILE SELECT ...
That seems nice and clear.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
