On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:32:21PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > >> That seems too confusing. > > > > > Ok. Are you voting for using EXEC as a keyword to replace ANALYZE? > > > > FWIW, given the conflict against "EXPLAIN EXECUTE prepared_stmt_name", > > we should probably just drop the whole idea. It seemed like a great > > idea at the time, but it's going to confuse people not just Bison. > > +1. I think trying to replace ANALYZE with something else is setting > ourselves up for years, possibly decades, worth of confusion. And > without any real benefit. > > Defaulting BUFFERS to ON is probably a reasonable change, thuogh.
Would this be worth back-patching? I ask because adding it will cause fairly large (if mechanical) churn in the regression tests. Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
