On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 11:15, Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 06:11:35PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > On 2019-Jun-09, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > > I think it should say: > > > > > > | Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should > > > be > > > | divided is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough > > > > I opined elsewhere in the thread that this phrase can be made into more > > straightforward English: > > > > Choosing the target number of partitions THAT the table should be > > divided INTO is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough > > > > What do you think of that formulation? > > It originally said: > | Choosing the number of partitions to divide the table into is also a > > So this mostly changes it back. > > One could also say: > | Another critical decision is [the choice of?] the number of partitions > | into which the table['s content?] should be divided... > > I'm okay with it if David is okay making the change :)
Changes attached. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
part_doc_pg11_v7.patch
Description: Binary data
part_doc_master_v7.patch
Description: Binary data
part_doc_pg10_v7.patch
Description: Binary data
