Hi,
On 2019-05-22 10:25:14 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 13 Feb 2019, at 19:27, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Turns out in portions of the regression tests a good chunk of the
> > runtime is inside AddNewAttributeTuples() and
> > recordMultipleDependencies()'s heap insertions. Looking at a few
> > profiles I had lying around I found that in some production cases
> > too. ISTM we should use heap_multi_insert() for both, as the source
> > tuples ought to be around reasonably comfortably.
> >
> > For recordMultipleDependencies() it'd obviously better if we collected
> > all dependencies for new objects, rather than doing so separately. Right
> > now e.g. the code for a new table looks like:
> >
> > recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL);
> >
> > recordDependencyOnOwner(RelationRelationId, relid, ownerid);
> >
> > recordDependencyOnNewAcl(RelationRelationId, relid, 0, ownerid,
> > relacl);
> >
> > recordDependencyOnCurrentExtension(&myself, false);
> >
> > if (reloftypeid)
> > {
> > referenced.classId = TypeRelationId;
> > referenced.objectId = reloftypeid;
> > referenced.objectSubId = 0;
> > recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced,
> > DEPENDENCY_NORMAL);
> > }
> >
> > and it'd obviously be more efficient to do that once if we went to using
> > heap_multi_insert() in the dependency code. But I suspect even if we
> > just used an extended API in AddNewAttributeTuples() (for the type /
> > collation dependencies), it'd be a win.
>
> When a colleague was looking at heap_multi_insert in the COPY codepath I
> remembered this and took a stab at a WIP patch inspired by this email, while
> not following it to the letter. It’s not going the full route of collecting
> all the dependencies for creating a table, but adding ways to perform
> multi_heap_insert in the existing codepaths as it seemed like a good place to
> start.
Cool. I don't quite have the energy to look at this right now, could you
create a CF entry for this?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
