Hi, On May 22, 2019 7:39:41 AM PDT, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >On 2019-04-29 19:32, Tom Lane wrote: >> Another problem is that while "%lu" format specifiers are portable, >> INT64_FORMAT is a *big* pain, not least because you can't put it into >> translatable strings without causing problems. To the extent that >> we could go over to "%zu" instead, maybe this could be finessed, >> but blind "s/long/int64/g" isn't going to be any fun. > >Since we control our own snprintf now, this could probably be addressed >somehow, right?
z is for size_t though? Not immediately first how It'd help us? Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
