On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 06:56:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > Note that I've added a few questions to individuals involved with > > specific points. If you're in the To: list, please search for your name. > > I'm not sure which of my commits you want me to opine on, other than > > > <listitem> > > <!-- > > Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> > > 2019-01-30 [5f5c01459] Allow RECORD and RECORD[] to be specified in > > function co > > --> > > <para> > > Allow <type>RECORD</type> and <type>RECORD[]</type> to be specified > > as a function <link linkend="sql-createfunction">return-value > > record</link> (Elvis Pranskevichus) > > </para> > > <para> > > DETAIL? > > </para> > > </listitem> > > > This description doesn't sound accurate to me. Tom? > > Yeah, maybe better > > Allow <type>RECORD</type> and <type>RECORD[]</type> to be used > as column types in a query's column definition list for a > table function that is declared to return <type>RECORD</type> > (Elvis Pranskevichus) > > You could link to "queries-tablefunctions" which describes the column > definition business; it's much more specific than "sql-createfunction".
Done. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
