Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-05-07 12:25:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Then session 2 deadlocks while session 3 finishes correctly. I don't
>> know if this is a class of problems we'd want to address for v12, but
>> if we do then CIC (and DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY?) could benefit from
>> it.
> This seems like a pre-existing issue to me. We probably should improve
> that, but I don't think it has to be tied to 12.
Yeah. CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY has always had a deadlock hazard,
so it's hardly surprising that REINDEX CONCURRENTLY does too.
I don't think that fixing that is in-scope for v12, even if we had
an idea how to do it, which we don't.
We do need to fix the wrong-lock-level problem of course, but
that seems straightforward.
regards, tom lane
