Hi,
On 2019-05-01 10:21:15 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, the dirty-hack version (attached) of the CommandCounterIncrement()
> approach fixes the issue for a REINDEX pg_class_oid_index; in solation
> even when using CCA. Started a whole CCA testrun with it, but the
> results of that will obviously not be in quick.
Not finished yet, but it got pretty far:
parallel group (5 tests): create_index_spgist index_including_gist
index_including create_view create_index
create_index ... ok 500586 ms
create_index_spgist ... ok 86890 ms
create_view ... ok 466512 ms
index_including ... ok 150279 ms
index_including_gist ... ok 109087 ms
test reindex_catalog ... ok 2285 ms
parallel group (16 tests): create_cast roleattributes drop_if_exists
create_aggregate vacuum create_am hash_func select create_function_3
constraints typed_table rolenames errors updatable_views triggers inherit
that's where it's at right now:
parallel group (20 tests): init_privs security_label gin password
drop_operator lock gist tablesample spgist
Greetings,
Andres Freund
