Hi, On 2019-04-29 11:18:49 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:10 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > If we don't want to rely on "L" constants then we'll have to write these > > cases like "work_mem * (size_t) 1024" which is ugly, lots more keystrokes, > > and prone to weird precedence problems unless you throw even more > > keystrokes (parentheses) at it. I'm not excited about doing that just > > to allow larger work_mem settings on Win64. > > I don't think that anybody cares about Win64 very much.
I seriously doubt this assertion. Note that the postgres packages on https://www.postgresql.org/download/windows/ do not support 32bit windows anymore (edb from 11 onwards, bigsql apparently always). And I think there's a pretty substantial number of windows users out there. Greetings, Andres Freund
