Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 2:10 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> If we don't want to change what the core code does with fdw_exprs, >> I think the only way to fix it is to hack postgres_fdw so that it >> won't generate plans involving the problematic case.
> Seems reasonable.
>> See attached.
> I read the patch. It looks good to me. I didn't test it, though.
Thanks for looking! Have a good vacation ...
regards, tom lane
