On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 09:47:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > The failure is a bit weird, as I would expect all those three actions > to be sequential. piculet is the only failure happening on the > buildfarm and it uses --disable-atomics, so I am wondering if that is > related and if 0dfe3d0 is part of that. With a primary/standby set, > it could be possible to test that scenario pretty easily. I'll give > it a shot.
The buildfarm has just failed with a similar failure, for another test aka 009_twophase.pl: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dragonet&dt=2019-04-16%2006%3A14%3A01 I think that we have race conditions with checkpointing and shutdown on HEAD. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
