On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > I don't have any comments on the code (but the test looks sensible, it's > the same trick I used to discover the issue in the first place).
After thinking some more on it, this behavior looks rather sensible to me. Are there any objections? > However, the doc patch lost the trailing paren: Fixed on my branch, thanks. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
