Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > So... I am coming up with the patch attached. I have introduced some > tests using a trick with CIC to have an invalid index to work on.
I don't have any comments on the code (but the test looks sensible, it's the same trick I used to discover the issue in the first place). However, the doc patch lost the trailing paren: > The recommended recovery > method in such cases is to drop the index and try again to perform > - <command>CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY</command>. (Another possibility is > to rebuild > - the index with <command>REINDEX</command>. However, since > <command>REINDEX</command> > - does not support concurrent builds, this option is unlikely to seem > - attractive.) > + <command>CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY</command>. (Another possibility is > + to rebuild the index with <command>REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY</command>. > </para> - ilmari -- - Twitter seems more influential [than blogs] in the 'gets reported in the mainstream press' sense at least. - Matt McLeod - That'd be because the content of a tweet is easier to condense down to a mainstream media article. - Calle Dybedahl
