On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:01 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2019年4月8日(月) 14:22 Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com>: > >> > >> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com] > >> > "vacuum_truncate" gets my vote too. > >> > >> +1 > > > > > > +1 > > ISTM that we have small consensus to > > use "vacuum_truncate". > > I'm also fine with this name, and I also saw reports that this option > is already needed in some production workload, as Andres explained.
OK, so I pushed the "vacuum_truncate" version of the patch. But it has not been actually pushed into the community's git repository yet.That's maybe because it's been a while since my last commit and my commit bit is temporarily limited? Anyway the patch has been pushed before April 8th 0:00 in AoE. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
