> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:05 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Although there are still some rough edges, e.g. going forth, back and forth > again leads to a sutiation, when `_bt_first` is not applied anymore and the > first element is wrongly skipped. I'll try to fix it with the next version of > patch.
It turns out that `_bt_skip` was unnecessary applied every time when scan was restarted from the beginning. Here is the fixed version of patch.
v11-0001-Index-skip-scan.patch
Description: Binary data
