Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> The basic idea being:
> - Each line is a whole message.
> - The line begins with <<< for a message received and >>> for a message sent.
+1, though do we really need to repeat the direction marker thrice?
> - Strings in single quotes are those sent/received as a fixed number of bytes.
> - Strings in double quotes are those sent/received as a string.
> - 4-byte integers are printed unadorned.
> - 2-byte integers are prefixed by #.
> - I guess 1-byte integers would need some other prefix, maybe @ or ##.
I doubt that anybody gives a fig for those distinctions, except when
they're writing actual code that speaks the protocol --- and I do not
think that that's the target use-case. So strings and integers seem
like plenty. I'd also suggest that just because the protocol has
single-letter codes for message types doesn't mean that average users
have memorized those codes; and that framing data like the message
length is of no interest.
In short, rather than
<<< 'T' 101 4 "Schema" 2615 #2 19 #64 -1 #0 "Name" 1259 #2 19 #64 -1 #0
"Owner" 0 #0 19 #64 -1 #0
I'd envision something more like
< RowDescription "Schema" 2615 2 19 64 -1 0 "Name" 1259 2 19 64 -1 0
"Owner" 0 0 19 64 -1 0
> But I still don't really see a need for different levels or whatever.
> I mean, you either want a dump of all of the protocol traffic, or you
> don't, I think. Or maybe I am confused as to what the goal of all
> this really is.
Yeah, me too. But a lot of this detail would only be useful if you
were trying to diagnose something like a discrepancy between the server
and libpq as to the width of some field. And the number of users for
that can be counted without running out of fingers. I think what would
be of use for a trace facility is as high-level a view as possible of
the message contents.
Or, in other words: a large part of the problem with the existing PQtrace
facility is that it *was* designed to help debug libpq itself, and that
use-case is no longer very interesting. We should assume that the library
knows how to parse protocol messages.
regards, tom lane
