> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:38 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > Works for me. With a quick read of the code, it seems to me that it > is possible to keep compatibility while keeping the simplifications > around ArchiveEntry()'s refactoring.
Yes, it should be rather simple, we can e.g. return to the old less consistent NULL handling approach something (like in the attached patch), or replace a NULL value with an empty string in WriteToc. Give me a moment, I'll check it out. At the same time I would suggest to keep replace_line_endings -> sanitize_line, since it doesn't break compatibility.
archive_entry_null_handling.patch
Description: Binary data
