On 2/16/19 10:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera >>> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a >>>>> light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically >>>>> correct, and uses an existing word. > >>>> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in >>>> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql > >>> Seconded! > >> +1 to MATERIALIZED too > > I was expecting more controversy ... pushed that way. > As you wish. I withdraw my previous vote and I propose AS [NOT] MATERIALIZED [yes|false] ;-) -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Alvaro Herrera
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Merlin Moncure
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tomas Vondra
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining ... Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlin... Jonathan S. Katz
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlin... Tomas Vondra
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlin... Andreas Karlsson
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlin... Andrew Gierth
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlin... Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlin... Andrew Gierth
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlin... Tom Lane
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlin... Andrew Gierth
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Andreas Karlsson
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Bruce Momjian
- Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Tatsuo Ishii