On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> >>> On 14/02/2019 16:11, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet? Can we make a decision? >>>> >>>> Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions >>>> I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or >>>> AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax). But we gotta pick something. >>> >>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a >>> light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically >>> correct, and uses an existing word. >> >> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in >> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql > > Seconded! >
+1 to MATERIALIZED too regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
