Hi, I am getting error while applying patch.I think the patch needs to be redone on the latest code in master as there are some commits in master after the patch is created
On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 13:44, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > > Hello Kyotaro-san, > > > On such standpoint, the first hunk in the patch attracted my > > eyes. > > > > <term><literal>host</literal></term> > > <listitem> > > <para> > > - Name of host to connect to.<indexterm><primary>host > name</primary></indexterm> > > - If a host name begins with a slash, it specifies Unix-domain > > - communication rather than TCP/IP communication; the value is the > > - name of the directory in which the socket file is stored. > > + </para> > > > > I don't think this is user-friendly since almost all of them don't write > > multiple hosts there. So I prefer the previous organization. > > ISTM that specifying the expected syntax is the first information needed? > > The previous organization says "this is a host name (bla bla bla) btw I > lied at the beginning this is a list". > > > The description about IP-address looks too verbose, especially we don't > > need explain what is IP-address here. > > Ok. > > I agree that the order is not the best possible one. Here is a simplified > and reordered version: > > """ Comma-separated list of hosts to connect to. Each item may be a host > name that will be resolved with a look-up, a numeric IP address that will > be used directly, or the name of a directory which contains the socket > file for Unix-domain communication, if the specification begins with a > slash. Each specified target will be tried in turn in the order given. See > <xref linkend="libpq-multiple-hosts"/> for details. """ > > What do you think about that version. > > -- > Fabien. > > -- Cheers Ram 4.0
