Hi, On 2018-10-26 09:21:51 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote: > (1) you are somehow against changing the current implementation, eg erroring > out on possibly misleading configurations, because you do not think it is > really useful to help users in those cases.
I find this formulation somewhat passive aggressive. > (2) you are not against improving the documentation, although you find it > clear enough already, but you agree that some people could get confused. > > The attached patch v4 only improves the documentation so that it reflects > what the implementation really does. I think it too bad to leave out the > user-friendly aspects of the patch, though. Robert, any chance you could opine on the doc patch, given that's your suggested direction? - Andres
