> On 5 Jan 2019, at 01:04, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:45:55PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> (Michael: sorry for not having responded to your comments on the patch, $life >> has had little time over for hacking lately) > > No worries, I understand. > >> There is that. We might not be excited about writing tests for this >> contrib module but someone else might want to use this for testing >> their application in a similar manner to how pg_regress tests? > > If we don't introduce it, there is no way to know. Still if somebody > needs to create regression tests they could just use EXPLAIN for the > same purpose. However, the option still seems useful to me to get out > plans with the most generic output, so I support the idea. If others > don't feel so, I am fine to give up as well.
This didn’t attract any other interested parties, and I don’t feel the added complexity is worth a continued discussion, so I’m closing this patch. Thanks for the review. cheers ./daniel
