> On 29. Jan 2019, at 10:45, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:19 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz > <mailto:mich...@paquier.xyz>> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 02:00:59PM +0100, Alex Kliukin wrote: > > While reading the doc page for the pg_basebackup, I've been confused > > by the fact that it says WAL files will be written to .tarballs > > (either base.tar or pg_wal.tar) when pg_basebackup is instructed to > > stream WALs alongside the backup itself. I think it makes sense to > > elaborate that it only happens when tar format is specified (doc > > patch is attached). > > Agreed. The current wording can be confusing depending on the format, > and your suggestion looks right. Any opinions from others? > > Agreed, definitely confusing. > > Since you also agreed on it, I went ahead and pushed (with backpatch).
Thanks a lot (and to Michael as well for looking into it)! Cheers, Oleksii
