On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:19 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 02:00:59PM +0100, Alex Kliukin wrote: > > While reading the doc page for the pg_basebackup, I've been confused > > by the fact that it says WAL files will be written to .tarballs > > (either base.tar or pg_wal.tar) when pg_basebackup is instructed to > > stream WALs alongside the backup itself. I think it makes sense to > > elaborate that it only happens when tar format is specified (doc > > patch is attached). > > Agreed. The current wording can be confusing depending on the format, > and your suggestion looks right. Any opinions from others? > Agreed, definitely confusing. Since you also agreed on it, I went ahead and pushed (with backpatch). -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
