On 2019-Jan-21, Chapman Flack wrote: > But the point's well taken that in /printed output/, that's of no use. > Which is, in a sense, an inconsistency: in one format, you can follow the > links, while in another, you're out of luck. > > Maybe a simpler transform for printed output, rather than collecting > all URLs into one section at the back, would just be to follow any > <ulink> that has link text with a <footnote> containing the same ulink > without the link text, so it shows the URL, and that would be right at > the bottom of the same 'page'.
Of course, the text would also be clickable, right? I think putting the URL in a footnote is good in that case; it works both on screen and on paper, which should alleviate JD's concerns. > I wouldn't think it important to apply the same treatment when making HTML. Right, only PDF. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
