On 01/10/19 23:48, Chapman Flack wrote: > On 12/30/18 22:23, Chapman Flack wrote: > (3) seems to be supported by (the only) precedent, the "Limits and > Compatibility" sect3 within functions-posix-regexp. > > So, absent objection, I'll work on a Limits and Compatibility sect2 > within functions-xml.
One fly in the ointment: tables of contents seem to list sect1 and sect2 elements, but not sect3. So the "Limits and Compatibility" sect3 under functions-posix-regexp does not clutter the overall "Functions and Operators" ToC, but a "Limits and Compatibility" sect2 under functions-xml would be visible there. Tucking it as a sect3 within an existing sect2 would prevent that, but it is common information that pertains to more than one of them, so that doesn't seem quite right. Or is it ok to have a "Limits and Compatibility" visible in the ToC under XML Functions? -Chap