Le 4 janvier 2019 13:16:48 GMT+01:00, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> a écrit : >On 19/11/2018 14:40, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> On 11/19/18 2:57 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 12:18:33PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: >>>> Since it's hard to come up with a concise name that will mention >sampling rate >>>> in the context of min_duration_statement, I think it's fine to name >this >>>> configuration "log_sample_rate", as long as it's dependency from >>>> log_min_duration_statements is clearly explained in the >documentation. >>> >>> log_sample_rate looks fine to me as a name. >> >> That seems far too short to me - the name should indicate it applies >to >> statement logging. I'd say log_statement_sample_rate is better. > >It was committed with this name, but then one has to wonder why it >doesn't also apply to log_statement. > >-- >Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ >PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Yes, but maybe log_min_duration_statements_sample is too long? -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
