On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 01:06:24PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Do we really want to add user-facing options just to be able to run > tests? Should we write the tests differently instead?
The take is that the output of the plans generated includes data which is run-dependent because the duration of the plan is generated unconditionally. One way to write generic tests considering this would be to use a TAP test, but I feel that's overdoing it just for this case. Being able to control if the plan duration shows up still looks like an interesting option to me independently of adding tests. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
