On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 11:42:49AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 01.01.2019, 11:38 +0900 schrieb Michael Paquier: >> About 3), aka --verify implied if no action is specified: >> - In favor: Fabien C, Magnus >> - Against: Michael P > > I think I'm in favor as well.
Okay, it looks to be the direction to take then. > I wonder whether we (or packagers) could then just ship a > pg_verify_checksums -> pg_checksums symlink for compatibility if we/they > want, as the behaviour would stay the same? In the v10 dev cycle this part has been discarded for the switch from pg_xlogdump to pg_waldump. I don't think that's worth bothering this time either in the build. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
