On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:38 PM David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 12/12/18 4:44 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2018-12-12 11:32:55 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> > >> +1 on all that. Per the trend of this thread, I see a bunch of > >> committers and contributors commenting about *not* removing this code, > >> so sending a patch to actually remove it looks like a throw into an > >> abysmal void. > > > > I don't think it's as clear as you make it out to be: > > > > In favor: > > - David Steele > > - Andres Freund > > - Stephen Frost, I think > > Against: > > - Simon Riggs > > - Robert Haas > > - Michael Paquier > > - Andreas Karlsson > > - Peter Eisentraut, I think > > > > While that's clearly lopsided, I still think it's pretty darn absurd to > > call such a situation "a throw into an abysmal void". > > The way I read the discussion, there is no consensus for getting this > into PG12, but there does seem to be one for PG13. > > I'll push this to the first post-PG12 CF when one appears. Can we just > go ahead and create a 2019-07 CF now? I know we generally discuss this > at PGCon, but we can always rename it, right? > We can, I guess. Are you saying you're likely to forget? :P For 12, it would probably be good to have a more clear deprecation notice into the documentations. Is that something on your list of things to work on, or should someone else (like, uh, me)? -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
