Re: Michael Paquier 2018-11-29 <20181129085902.gd9...@paquier.xyz> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:47:09AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > A customer was complaining that the "checkpoint starting: xlog" > > message was not included in the grand PG10 rename of user-visible > > bits. The attached patch fixes that. > > At the same time it would make sense to rename CHECKPOINT_CAUSE_XLOG? I > would not risk back-patching such a change as that would be annoying for > tools parsing logs like pgbadger.
There's hundreds of other internal uses of xlog that were not touched either, only the user-facing parts were changed. If this gets accepted, I'll submit a patch for pgbadger so it can be updated before PG12 hits the field. Christoph
