On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:22 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > But maybe you've adopted that policy already. You back-patched a > > behavior change 2 days before a minor release when the vote was 2-3 > > against the change. > > It was? This is my count: > For: Alvaro, Andrew, Tom > Against: Michael, Robert, Andres
Tom's message was posted after you had already committed it. His vote counts from the point of view of determining retrospectively whether your action had support, but you can't use it to justify the decision to push the commit when you did, unless you used a time machine to foresee his message before he posted it. > Also, I contested every point that was raised about this patch. I don't > think there were any remaining technical objections. Sure, but I don't think the standard is whether you told people that they were wrong. I think the standard is whether you convinced them to revise their position. You sure haven't convinced me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company