On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 09:27:39AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > You actually do a lot, moving just one person with MP as initials to > consider moving the function as being parallel-safe. Thanks for the > points you raised, what needs to be done looks clear now.
So anybody has an objection with marking the function as parallel-safe? I'd like to do so if that's not the case and close the case. What has been raised on this thread is more than I hoped first. Thanks Amit and Robert for the additional input! -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
