Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 2 Nov 2018, at 15:42, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Anybody have an opinion about which approach to use? We need to choose
>> one, and PDQ too, if we want full buildfarm coverage on it before Monday's
>> wrap.
> #1 is the option that appeals to me the most, mostly because it removes all
> possible ambiguity of when/if it’s required compared to #2.
I'm sort of leaning in that direction too, after sleeping on it.
It's also closer to what we already shipped in 11.0 than #2 is.
regards, tom lane
