On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 5:56 AM Mihail Nikalayeu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > The fix and a reproducer are in the attachments. > > Affects 16 and up, from 89e46da5e51. >
The patch looks good, just a small suggestion that the function header of IsIndexUsableForReplicaIdentityFull() probably could do with a comment so that future callers are aware of this potential shortfall. Something like: * Note that this function does not check indisvalid. Callers that are * selecting an index to use for future lookups must check indisvalid * themselves and reject invalid indexes regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia
