On Fri, Jul 3, 2026 at 2:54 PM Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> There's no overflow anymore with the current patch, so that comment is
> somewhat stale. Maybe it could be simply "large future intervals are
> rejected"?
>

Thanks Zsolt! Good catch. Updated the test comment in v5 attached.

Thanks,
Baji Shaik

Attachment: v5-0002-Reject-out-of-range-timestamps-in-uuidv7-interval.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v5-0001-Reject-infinite-intervals-in-uuidv7-interval.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to