Hi, On 2018-10-05 15:31:37 -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 10/4/18 11:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Jonathan S. Katz" <jk...@postgresql.org> writes: > >> On 10/4/18 8:34 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > >>> I am suggesting to fix the issue after RC1 is released, but before GA. > > > >> That approach would mean we would require an RC2, which would further > >> delay the GA. > > > > Not sure about that. Alvaro seems to think there's a generic problem > > in event trigger processing, which if true, was likely there pre-v11. > > I don't think that patches that get back-patched further than 11 > > need to restart the RC clock. > > Well, unless we are targeting it for the release? AIUI the RCs are > should be equivalent to GA[1] (and yes I see the qualifier of "should be").
FWIW, I think that's a pretty pointless restriction. We release bugfixes in minor releases all the time, so there's imo absolutely no point in having a blanket restriction that a fix that we'd put in a minor release shouldn't be slipped in between RC and GA. Greetings, Andres Freund
