On 23/05/2018 08:46, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > "tls-unique" and "tls-server-end-point" are overly technical to users. > They don't care which one is used, there's no difference in security.
A question was raised about this in a recent user group meeting. When someone steals the server certificate from the real database server and sets up a MITM with that certificate, this would pass tls-server-end-point channel binding, because both the MITM and the real server have the same certificate. But with tls-unique they would have different channel binding data, so the channel binding would detect this. Is that not correct? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
