On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 12:03 PM Corey Huinker <[email protected]> wrote: > I had assumed we wanted a generic C API to these two functions, but if we > want something that is specific to FDWs, that might change where the > functions land in the header files. It's an easy change to make if we change > our minds, but it would be good to know if we do or do not want something > specific to FDWs. Personally, I think FDWs will be 90-95% of the usages > outside of the existing SQL-defined functions, but 95% is not 100%, so I'd be > inclined to leave them in a statistics/stats utils header.
I don't want it to be specific to FDWs, just convenient for FDWs. Agree they should stay in a statistics header. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
