> > > IMO I don't think we need to go that far, because 1) the new functions > are provided for FDW authors only, and 2) we don't make changes to the > stats that often. >
That would be simpler, to be sure. However, in the past I've received pushback on functions that had a large number of parameters, and this would definitely be a large number of parameters, approximately 17, so I thought I should at least offer the variadic way. I'm proceeding with the many-parameters model.
