On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 2:05 PM Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you think Test::Session is good to go, I see no reason not to > > improve the Perl tests (since there seems to be a growing consensus > > that the conversion won't happen overnight). > > There's a fairly high amount of friction here, though. If we didn't plan > to replace the perl tests it would be worth it, but I'm not sure it's > worth it if we are.
Ah, I didn't realize that. In that case you're probably right (especially if the opportunity cost is time helping with the Python port). --Jacob
