On 2026-06-17 We 12:01 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 6:39 AM Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> wrote:
OK, so the consensus I'm sensing is that we should add a pytest
framework, backpatch it into all the live branches, and initially port
some relatively contained set of tests and backpatch that too.
As for "new tests that can't easily be written today": I've already
written several protocol-level tests for OAuth that implement broken
client and server behavior (they're in the pg-pytest-suite thread).
Those could be ported for review on top of the new framework. I could
look at some of the more recent ad-hoc Perl socket tests at the same
time.

If I had
to pick a candidate suite it would be the recovery tests (and my patch
set conveniently contains a patch specifically for those).
No strong opinions here on the candidates for initial backport -- but
I will note that src/test/recovery doesn't look like a small slice, at
13k lines and more than half of the Test::Cluster API used.

I guess
that means the Test::Session work gets left on the cutting room floor -
if we run into issues with perl tests the answer will be to convert them
to pytest.
If you think Test::Session is good to go, I see no reason not to
improve the Perl tests (since there seems to be a growing consensus
that the conversion won't happen overnight).


There's a fairly high amount of friction here, though. If we didn't plan to replace the perl tests it would be worth it, but I'm not sure it's worth it if we are. To keep things in sync, which people have expressed concerns about, we'd need to backport it. The whole set is not humungous but it's not tiny either:

59 files changed, 3317 insertions(+), 1113 deletions(-)

Then there's the matter of needing either libffi + FFI::Platypus or needing to create/maintain an XS wrapper.

With pytest I feel much more confident about backpatching it because all we need is python itself + pytest and ideally pexpect;

So I'm prepared to put the work in if people think it's a good idea, but I want a fairly solid indication of that.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com



Reply via email to