Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2018-10-03 13:31:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I do not see the point of messing with snprintf.c here. I doubt that >> strfromd is faster than the existing sprintf call (because the latter >> can use ".*" instead of serializing and deserializing the precision).
> I'm confused, the numbers I posted clearly show that it's faster?
Those were in the context of whether float8out went through snprintf.c
or directly to strfromd, no?
regards, tom lane
