Hi, On 2018-10-03 13:31:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I do not see the point of messing with snprintf.c here. I doubt that > strfromd is faster than the existing sprintf call (because the latter > can use ".*" instead of serializing and deserializing the precision).
I'm confused, the numbers I posted clearly show that it's faster? Greetings, Andres Freund
